There are times when I wonder what is the point of writing academic arguments – it doesn’t seem to matter what you say, because people will just make it up anyway. In the course of the last year, I’ve commented on a couple of references which have set me up with positions I don’t hold. Today I’ve come across a paper written for a conference in Indonesia which says this:
Paul Spicker argues that poverty is an individual issue caused by the weakness and choice of the individual concerned. Poverty will disappear if market power is expanded to the maximum and economic growth is driven to the highest possible level.
For the avoidance of doubt, I do not hold this position, and I have never held it. I cannot imagine why anyone who has read what I do write should suppose that I might think this way.